A 1031 exchange, also known as a like-kind exchange, is a tax-deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Code that generally allows a seller of investment real estate to defer federal and state capital gains taxes by using the proceeds from the sale of their original property (the “Relinquished Property”) to acquire another investment property or properties (the “Replacement Property”).
The primary benefit of completing a 1031 exchange is the ability to defer capital gains taxes on the sale of real estate and therefore reinvest 100% of the sale proceeds into another real estate investment.
To be eligible for a 1031 exchange, both the Relinquished Property and the Replacement Property must be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment purposes. For example, an office building and a rental condominium would both be eligible for a 1031 exchange upon sale. A second home owned exclusively for personal use would not be eligible for a 1031 exchange upon sale, as it would not meet the requirement of being held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment purposes.
Luckily for investors, the rules regarding what’s considered “like-kind” for 1031 exchange purposes are quite broad. A self-storage facility can be exchanged for an office building. Farmland can be exchanged for an apartment building. All that matters is that both the Relinquished Property and the Replacement Property constitute real estate held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment purposes.
Most 1031 exchanges take the form of “deferred exchanges,” meaning that there is a gap in time between the sale of the Relinquished Property and the purchase of the Replacement Property (i.e., the two transactions do not occur simultaneously). However, if the seller of the Relinquished Property has the right to receive, control, or use the proceeds from the sale of the Relinquished Property before the 1031 exchange is completed (which is referred to by the IRS as “constructive receipt”), then the exchange will not qualify for tax-deferred treatment under Section 1031 of the Code.
To avoid “constructive receipt,” the seller engages a third-party known as a qualified intermediary (“QI”). The role of the QI is to act as an independent intermediary between the buyer and the seller of the properties involved in the 1031 exchange. The QI holds the funds from the sale of the Relinquished Property and uses those funds to purchase the Replacement Property. This process ensures that the seller of the Relinquished Property does not take constructive receipt of the sale proceeds and thus avoids triggering a taxable event.
From a real estate seller’s perspective, the steps of a typical 1031 exchange are generally as follows:
In order to maximize tax deferral in a 1031 exchange, the purchase price of the Replacement Property (or Properties) must be, in aggregate, at least as much as the sale price of the Relinquished Property.
In a 1031 exchange, if mortgage debt is repaid as part of the sale of a Relinquished Property, the amount of debt paid off using sale proceeds is considered “boot” which is subject to taxation and could reduce the amount of the seller’s tax deferral. For example, let’s say someone sells a Relinquished Property for $500,000 with a mortgage balance of $200,000. If the mortgage debt is paid off as part of the sale and the amount of the debt is not properly replaced, the seller will receive $200,000 of “boot.” To remedy this situation and maintain full tax deferral as part of his or her 1031 exchange, the seller must acquire $500,000 of Replacement Properties. This means the seller must either (i) contribute an additional $200,000 of cash so that, when combined with the $300,000 of net equity proceeds from the sale of the Relinquished Property, the seller is able to acquire $500,000 of Replacement Properties, or (ii) take on $200,000 of new debt as part of the acquisition of his or her Replacement Properties.
A Delaware Statutory Trust, or DST, is an investment vehicle that can provide an individual investor access to commercial real estate that may be too large for the investor to acquire on its own. The DST accomplishes this by allowing commercial real estate to be fractionalized, giving investors the opportunity to acquire a percentage interest in the DST and, as a result, in the real estate that the DST owns.
In 2004, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2004-86 concerning the tax treatment of a DST for purposes of 1031 exchanges. The ruling specified that if a DST met certain requirements, including the following seven (referred to as the “Seven Deadly Sins”), beneficial interests in the DST could be utilized as Replacement Property in a 1031 exchange.
The DST structure has been widely adopted because it provides numerous advantages for 1031 exchange investors relative to other forms of Replacement Property ownership, including: (1) the ability to right-size the investment to more precisely match the size of the Replacement Property to that of the Relinquished Property, (2) the ability for investors to gain access to large commercial properties or even pools of properties, (3) potentially lower transaction and administrative costs, and (4) where applicable, potentially more favorable financing terms.
Prior to the global financial crisis, the tenancy-in-common (“TIC”) structure was the most commonly used approach for fractionalizing commercial real estate for syndicated 1031 exchange offerings. However, the global financial crisis revealed some of the shortcomings of the TIC structure, including management complexity, unanimous consent requirements and the potentially conflicting interests of the multiple tenancy-in-common owners. This made loan workouts and other difficult decisions resulting from the global financial crisis harder to process. Since then, the DST structure has taken hold as the preferred approach in the syndicated 1031 exchange space for numerous reasons, including but not limited to the following:
A real estate investment trust, or REIT, is an investment vehicle that owns and operates income-producing real estate and other real estate-related investments on behalf of its investors. In general, a REIT is a company that:
A net asset value REIT, commonly referred to as a “NAV REIT,” is a type of REIT that generally exhibits some or all of the following characteristics:
One of the key advantages of NAV REITs is that they generally exhibit less price volatility than publicly-traded REITs. This is because publicly-traded REITs’ securities are priced by the trading market which is influenced by numerous factors, not all of which are related to the underlying value of the REIT’s real estate assets and liabilities. NAV REITs’ utilization of net asset value-based pricing (with real estate values generally determined using a third-party appraisal process) eliminates the impact of public securities market sentiment and other ancillary factors, generally leading to reduced pricing volatility relative to that exhibited by publicly-traded REITs.
Section 721(a) of the Code generally provides that neither a contributing partner nor a recipient partnership will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon a contribution of property to the partnership in exchange for an equivalent-value partnership interest therein. Such a tax-deferred contribution of property to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership is sometimes referred to as a 721 exchange.
UPREIT stands for “Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust.” An UPREIT is a type of REIT that holds all or substantially all of its investments through a subsidiary limited partnership referred to as its Operating Partnership in which the REIT acts as general partner. Many large REITs operate as UPREITs, and they use this structure because a sale or contribution of property directly to a REIT is generally a taxable transaction to the selling property owner. However, a seller who desires to defer the recognition of taxable gain on the sale of its property may transfer the property to the REIT’s Operating Partnership for partnership interests referred to as “OP Units” and, under Section 721 of the Code, defer the taxation of the gain generally until the seller later redeems its OP Units for cash or, at the discretion of the REIT, for REIT shares. Using an UPREIT structure gives the REIT an advantage in acquiring desired properties from persons who may not otherwise sell their properties because of unfavorable tax results.
Operating Partnership Units, or “OP Units” as they are more commonly called, are partnership interests in a REIT’s Operating Partnership. Each OP Unit is intended to be the substantial economic equivalent of one share of the corresponding class of the REIT’s common stock. This means that each OP Unit will have the same NAV and will be paid the same gross ongoing distributions as a corresponding share of the REIT’s common stock of the same class. Also, just as a REIT can have different share classes with differing distribution-related and other fees, the REIT’s Operating Partnership can have different classes of OP Units for the same reasons. However, OP Units are a different investment than common shares in many respects, including tax treatment, voting rights and redemption rights.
UPREIT transactions (i.e., 721 exchanges of real property with a REIT’s Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units) are generally less complex and can be easier to execute than 1031 exchanges. This is because many of the requirements of a 1031 exchange such as the need for a QI, the need to identify Replacement Properties within 45 days, the need to acquire Replacement Properties within 180 days, etc., are not applicable to 721 exchanges.
However, the biggest impediment to an individual investor completing a 721 exchange is that the REIT’s Operating Partnership must first want to acquire that investor’s property. Given that most REITs generally focus on acquiring large commercial properties, the likelihood that an individual investor will own a property that a REIT wants to acquire is extremely limited. This is why most individual investors focus on 1031 exchanges as opposed to 721 exchanges as their primary tax-deferral strategy.
A 1031 UPREIT Program is a syndicated DST program designed for 1031 exchange investors that can potentially allow them to go from owning an active investment in real property to owning a passive interest in the overall portfolio of a REIT, all on a tax-deferred basis. This can be accomplished by combining the benefits of a 1031 exchange with those of an UPREIT transaction as further described below.
Yes, there are two general types of 1031 UPREIT Programs. The differences between the two come down to the structure of a key component of the 1031 UPREIT Program, the fair market value purchase option (the “FMV Purchase Option”). The FMV Purchase Option gives the REIT’s Operating Partnership the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the beneficial interests in the DST from all investors in exchange for OP Units in a tax-deferred UPREIT transaction or for cash. The two different types of 1031 UPREIT Programs structure their FMV Purchase Options differently, as further described below:
Osage Exchange’s principals were part of the team that helped structure the original mandatory 1031 UPREIT Program, and Osage Exchange continues to assist real estate sponsors in establishing, structuring and administering mandatory 1031 UPREIT Programs as a way to raise equity capital for their REITs.
The steps of a typical 1031 UPREIT transaction are generally as follows:
1031 UPREIT Programs are unique in that they can provide substantial benefits to all parties involved.
Investor Benefits
Distribution Partner Benefits
REIT Benefits
Initially, 1031 UPREIT Program offerings and traditional DST offerings are very similar. Both sell beneficial interests in a DST that holds one or more real properties to investors seeking to complete 1031 exchanges of real estate. Operationally, both make ongoing cash flow distributions and provide annual tax reporting statements to investors. The key differentiator between a 1031 UPREIT Program offering and a traditional DST offering is provided by the FMV Purchase Option. If this option is exercised, several benefits available only to 1031 UPREIT Program participants can be realized, including but not limited to:
Another differentiator between 1031 UPREIT Programs and traditional DST programs has to do with the motivations of the sponsor in each case and the impact that has on overall fees. With traditional DST programs, the sponsor has no long-term tie to the assets. As such, the sponsor is motivated to treat its DST offerings as highly transactional, often looking to make as much money from fees as the market will allow. In a 1031 UPREIT Program, fees and expenses are generally lower, as the sponsor’s primary motivation is to raise REIT equity capital.
Finally, the master lease structure utilized by many 1031 UPREIT Programs can be more investor-friendly than the master leases used by typical DST programs. Many 1031 UPREIT Program master leases are long-term (generally 10 – 20 years), fixed rate (reducing exposure to things like underlying property vacancy), and are often fully guaranteed by a substantive entity (i.e., the REIT’s Operating Partnership).
Properties used in many 1031 UPREIT Programs (and, in particular, most mandatory 1031 UPREIT Programs) are generally chosen either from the sponsoring REIT’s existing real estate portfolio or from its investment pipeline. These properties must meet certain criteria related to DST qualification, projected income and total return potential, tax implications to the REIT and other factors. In all cases, the properties are selected and underwritten by the REIT’s investment team independent of the 1031 UPREIT Program and are designated for potential long-term hold by the REIT. This is important because for any given 1031 UPREIT offering, while there can never be a guarantee that the FMV Purchase Option will be exercised, selecting properties that the REIT’s investment team views as potential long-term holds increases the probability that it will be.
Prior to the launch of a mandatory 1031 UPREIT offering, the DST and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the REIT’s Operating Partnership referred to as the Master Tenant enter into a long-term triple-net master lease of the DST’s properties (the “Master Lease”) with the DST as owner and lessor and the Master Tenant as lessee. The DST earns income from the properties pursuant to a fixed payment schedule as outlined in the Master Lease and payable by the Master Tenant. Further, the Master Tenant sub-leases the properties to their end tenants and has full responsibility with respect to the properties, including but not limited to managing, leasing, operating and maintaining the properties. In this way, the Master Tenant takes on a significant portion of the ongoing operational risks associated with the properties during the term of the Master Lease.
The Master Tenant in most mandatory 1031 UPREIT offerings is a special purpose entity wholly-owned by the REIT’s Operating Partnership, and it is generally not expected to have any substantial assets. For this reason, the financial and other obligations of the Master Tenant under each Master Lease are fully guaranteed by the REIT’s Operating Partnership pursuant to a guaranty agreement (the “Guaranty”). For this reason, the credit underlying each Master Lease is that of the Operating Partnership as a whole and not just that of the Master Tenant, which is a significant benefit to investors.
The combination of the Master Lease and the Guaranty provide a number of benefits to 1031 UPREIT Program investors, including but not limited to the following:
Each 1031 UPREIT Program DST will be managed by a separate entity, referred to as the manager, which is often an affiliate of the REIT’s external advisor. The manager will also serve as the signatory trustee of each DST. The manager’s responsibilities with respect to any given 1031 UPREIT Program DST will be outlined in that DST’s Trust Agreement, and will generally include but are not limited to (i) collecting rents and making distributions, (ii) entering into agreements to sell interests in the DST to investors, (iii) complying with the terms of any financing documents, (iv) notifying the relevant parties in any event of default, (v) determining if and when to make a transfer distribution, and (vi) determining if and when to sell the properties owned by the DST.
Each investor will receive, on an ongoing basis, its pro rata allocation of available cash from the DST in which it owns an interest. The amount of available cash to be distributed by the DST will be determined by the manager. During the term of the Master Lease, available cash will generally consist of Master Lease rental payments less certain fees, expenses, debt service (if applicable) and reserves.
No, an investor should not plan to have access to liquidity while owning DST interests.
A transfer distribution occurs in the event that the manager determines the Master Tenant is insolvent or has defaulted in paying rent, or in certain other circumstances, and the manager further determines to address such risks by transferring title to the property or properties held by a given DST to a Springing LLC, a newly formed Delaware limited liability company, and terminating the applicable DST. If a DST is terminated pursuant to a transfer distribution, the owners of beneficial interests in that DST will become members in the Springing LLC, and the manager, or an entity controlled by or affiliated with the manager, will become the manager of the Springing LLC.
The FMV Purchase Option is an option held by a REIT’s Operating Partnership to acquire 100% of the beneficial interests of a given DST, and it is provided for in the Trust Agreement of each DST and/or other transaction documents utilized in the 1031 UPREIT Program. In mandatory 1031 UPREIT Programs, the FMV Purchase Option gives the Operating Partnership the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the beneficial interests of a given DST in exchange for OP Units or cash, at the Operating Partnership’s discretion. The Operating Partnership generally expects to utilize OP Units when exercising FMV Purchase Options, so even though there is no guarantee that the FMV Purchase Option for any given DST will be exercised, investors in mandatory 1031 UPREIT Programs should invest with the understanding that there is a high likelihood that they will ultimately receive OP Units.
In mandatory 1031 UPREIT offerings, the FMV Purchase Option is exercisable by the Operating Partnership with respect to a given DST beginning on the first day after all owners have held their beneficial interests in the DST for at least two (2) years. In optional 1031 UPREIT offerings, the FMV Purchase Option may not be exercisable until later, often when the manager of the DST determines it is time to sell the DST’s properties.
The purchase price of the DST beneficial interests for the purposes of the FMV Purchase Option will be based on the fair market value of the properties held by the DST. The fair market value of the DST’s properties will be determined through an appraisal process utilizing one or more independent firm or firms selected by the manager of the DST in its sole discretion, less applicable liabilities and adjustments for customary prorations. Any such value shall be determined without any discounts but taking into account that the DST’s properties are subject to the Master Lease.
If the Operating Partnership chooses to exercise the FMV Purchase Option with respect to a given DST in exchange for OP Units, different investors in the DST may receive different classes of OP Units that bear different fees, as determined by each investor’s participating dealer, RIA, or other applicable selling channel. The selling agreements executed by each participating dealer, RIA, or other distribution partner will identify which particular class of OP Units their investors may receive if the Operating Partnership chooses to exercise the FMV Purchase Option in exchange for OP Units.
Distributions to OP Unitholders as of the applicable record date are generally made on a monthly or quarterly basis in amounts determined by the REIT. Specifically with respect to investors that own OP Units, distributions with respect to such OP Units are expected to be made in the same gross amounts per OP Unit that match the amounts per share of the applicable class of REIT common stock, which distributions are expected to be paid on a monthly or quarterly basis, so that a holder of one OP Unit will receive substantially the same amount of annual cash distributions as the amount of annual distributions paid to the holder of one share of the applicable class of REIT common stock (before taking into account certain tax withholdings that certain states may require with respect to OP Units).
Yes. An OP Unitholder may require the Operating Partnership to redeem any or all of the OP Units which it has held for a period of at least one year. Such OP Units will be redeemed, in the REIT’s sole discretion as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, for either cash or an amount of shares of REIT common stock with the same NAV as the OP Units that are redeemed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an OP Unitholder generally may not submit more than two notices of redemption during each calendar year.
Please note that the redemption of OP Units is a taxable event, even if shares of REIT common stock are received by the redeeming OP Unitholder instead of cash. If the REIT elects to honor an OP Unitholder’s redemption request using shares of REIT common stock, the redeeming OP Unitholder will generally be notified in advance and will be given the opportunity to rescind his or her redemption request.